{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreieqjgvoyhmar4mrq4vcznm455ien7dsu4ohe6di3g7zb6pgnhcsfm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmtx37dfxtq2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33412&p=274765#p274765",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-27T14:57:32.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> My question is: are we proposing to add Qt support, or to replace GTK with Qt?\n\nAs it has been stated here before, the idea is to **ADD** Qt as an alternative for future-proofing, while Gtk will stay both as Gtk2 - even if only for self-building, at some point - and Gtk3.\n\n> And to make it clear about he following statement for any readers:\n> Slackware -current ships w/ GTK 1, 2, 3, & 4 and Qt 5 & 6, plus a default install includes a full development suite with everything from gnucobol to ninja, including both python 2 & 3, with gcc version 15.2. (It also has Qt Designer and Glade standard.)\n\nI believe this was meant for the PM developers in the idea that a Slackware setup would allow them to build and test any and all Gtk and Qt versions of Pale Moon before release. At least that's how I saw it, and my apologies if it wasn't right.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: Linux Pale Moon with Qt toolkit",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-27T14:57:32.000Z"
}