{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiasoxv2xnnou5uopwaxntguvhakrvgwy7jkg3ryafamrk4rv5p4fe",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmsosgzmxow2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33412&p=274748#p274748",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-27T03:19:15.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "I prefer GTK2 to GTK3, and Qt would be just fine with me.\n\nPersonally, I appreciate having more options at compile time. My question is: are we proposing _to add_ Qt support, or _to replace_ GTK with Qt? (...and, again, I would be fine either way, I'm just looking for clarification.)\n\n\n**Off-topic:**\nOff-topic addendum:\nI don't want to sound too preachy here, but I feel you guys might suffer far fewer headaches on the Linux side of PM/UXP, if you'd go Slack.\nSlackware -current ships w/ GTK 1, 2, 3, & 4 and Qt 5 & 6, plus a default install includes a full development suite with everything from gnucobol to ninja, including both python 2 & 3, with gcc version 15.2. (It also has Qt Designer and Glade standard.)\n\n...just sayin'... Carry on.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: Linux Pale Moon with Qt toolkit",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-27T03:19:15.000Z"
}