{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreig2o7lropg7vjpjsyu6qflhjwkfaz5rtig67z7aryfy7nakw2tvsa",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmrtx4mzf632"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33466&p=274738#p274738",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-26T20:13:48.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> I just wonder how we can... you know, not be chained to Firefox? It's like, we started off rebasing the browser on Firefox every few years. Then it got harder and harder until we stopped at UXP, but kept backporting stuff from Mozilla for a long time. Now more and more complex stuff has to be done by us from scratch. But it seems like it's hard to break out of that and establish an independent identity...\n\nThe stuff we are talking about in this thread (or should be talking about) is just marketing. How does Pale Moon describe itself to the public? Is there some way to get people to put their attention on something that's so much more positive - like \"European led development that's not associated with the EVIL American big Tech corporations\". And \"Single process has a smaller attack surface than the other browsers - more secure by default\". Stuff like that, that's easy to point to, that gives you a big advantage over others.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Pale Moon's PR Problem",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-26T20:13:48.000Z"
}