{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiefbc27ryzx3bvd6htyoqounxrgehmvboeph6pywwlglctavencla",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmqlowlzc4e2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33468&p=274703#p274703",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-26T07:50:58.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> Nordstrand has no JIT, therefore it's more secure. A JIT in a browser is a security risk.\n\nI could be misunderstanding, but this almost feels like you're making fun of us a little for being opposed to e10s rather than making a serious argument...\n\nIt comes off like you're trying to do the software-writing equivalent of this:\n\n\"Pale Moon is more secure because it avoids e10s, which improves performance at the cost of security in a way we found unacceptable.\"\n\n\"Oh yeah? Hold my beer, I'm going to write an even more limited browser that doesn't have a JIT. That makes it even better than Pale Moon, right? Because JIT can cause security issues.\"\n\n\"Uhh... no, having no JIT is terrible, JavaScript would execute very slowly. What are you talking about?\n\n\"I rest my case, see, this is how you look to everyone else.\"\n\n*argument ensues where nuance about how e10s is different from JIT is ignored and the other person acts like they won*\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Nordstjernen web browser",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-26T07:50:58.000Z"
}