{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiemm62wx3xpmg7me2wrqs6r5elb4itsmidp4grnhwhrnmou777ndy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmow2eovcad2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33466&p=274652#p274652",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-25T15:03:16.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> > promoting it as a new browser that is untethered from Firefox's past would be useful\n>\n> We've already done that for years, unless you mean promoting it as something that has no historic links to Firefox and doesn't draw on Firefox/Mozilla development, and that would just be an outright lie which we will absolutely, without question, be called out for. Then we'll get to deal with being called \"fake\" alongside other terms opponents are already using. If I wanted to kill the project, then that would be a very good way to do it. Fixing our PR? No way.\n\nThere is one way to promote it differently that would fit with the public's current desires - promote Pale Moon as a \"European-developed independent browser with a smaller attack surface (single process) for greater control over security compared to American big-tech company browsers\", something like that. Could be interesting - might even be picked up as the browser of choice for various European government agencies, companies, etc. Could even generate some healthy donations.\n\nI mean if you just wanted to go with the European tech marketing flavor of the day, something that lots of other European tech projects are doing quite successfully, this would seem to be right up your alley.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Pale Moon's PR Problem",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-25T15:03:16.000Z"
}