{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicqu5qjgdpktcr42ilz46bb2hykrqchqznpprwlcehlcu7frfcc5i",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmlkjsvamqy2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33466&p=274597#p274597",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-24T07:11:21.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> \"Non-woke\"... While I understand the angle here and I agree there's a ton of PR fluff around some browsers about being \"super-inclusive\" and what not (to a fault), I don't want to be broadcasting such a message. Not in the least because I'm neither \"woke\" (also: define that for me, please? I've heard plenty of weird explanations what it's supposed to be; I have my own definition of it.\n\nI really wish the word woke was being used correctly by the world. It really just means you just became awake.\n\nAlso, based is taken out of context to mean the opposite of woke.\n\nBoth of those words are used in ways that are BS.\n\n\nenough said there.\n\n> People do not want Firefox, as you pointed out they are down to 3% market share and dropping like a rock. And I can't think of a single Firefox-based browser that is currently gaining any market share, or that has more than a tiny piece of the market measured in tenths of a percent or hundredths of a percen\n\nWhy anyone would use chrome is just beyond me.\n\nChrome is made by google...\n\nSupporting google is basically like saying, let's kill privacy for good!\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Pale Moon's PR Problem",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-24T07:11:21.000Z"
}