{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreig4ifkmtshlowcc6dujesrgdufls7u4omowbwcweyidupy72bsl2y",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmkw4fpv5ct2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33466&p=274584#p274584",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-24T02:26:21.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> Yeah, I feel like that's a huge problem because I don't see developing some retro thing that has no future and caters to sad people who live in the past as worthwhile[…] I don't really want to do \"retro,\" and sometimes it feels like that's the only thing people want from us. UXP is way too much work for it to just be someone's nostalgia trip.\n\nI see the matter another way. **Nature does not know the year.** There is no inherent reason that sensible browser design like yours, which permits far more than ‘consume content in a web app surrounded by flat design’, ought to be confined to the realm of nostalgia, even if Google and friends want it that way because it means more profit for them. The future is made of human choices. We are among those who reject Google’s vision in favour of one which was more popular in 2010, and will therefore appear antiquated. If it were not for Google constantly undoing your work, I do not think that conflicts between you and the true retrocomputing users would erupt nearly as often.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Pale Moon's PR Problem",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-24T02:26:21.000Z"
}