{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidyimhuhb7udmubdo2fpwfilkqfznz63u6afzr57icx6iuyrsltqm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmfuzvy5r6f2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=32872&p=274469#p274469",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-22T00:33:49.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> I've grown bored of Debian and distros based on it. The older packages don't really \"bother\" me, it's pretty reliable and everything works, but I get curious when new software or updates come out and there's many new features and fixes. I've been considering Fedora since it seems great for me, but I'm too lazy to switch everything over right now, especially since it requires more effort to do so with a Raspberry Pi as one's only computer.\n\nI'd say Fedora's kind of a middle ground between a fast-moving distro like Arch with a rolling release, and something a bit slower like Debian stable. And really it is a pretty good baseline for what to expect from an average Linux distro. It's why a lot of times when I want to see how something would fare on an average modern Linux distro, I test Fedora first. Not everyone would agree with that rule of thumb, but it's worked pretty well for me over the years.\n\nIn general, it does feel like people either want something slower and more conservative like Debian or an older enterprise Linux that just gets security updates to avoid surprises, or they want bleeding-edge rolling release like Arch or something. There's not as many people in-between, but Fedora and a few others like it seem to sit there for those looking for something that's \"just right\" in that regard.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Linux has over 6% of the desktop market",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-22T00:33:49.000Z"
}