{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibcfe2lmq467iu7jg3u2doqarplti3nr4zxigefe6b3tmedainlle",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmethmzfo3u2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33464&p=274456#p274456",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-21T14:55:01.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "The project is not clear about the license(s) of the source code. For instance, ther is no LICENSE file. Yes, _some_ files begin stating the license of the file, but not of the entire project.\n\nOne could _assume_ that all code excluding branding is released under the MPL 2.0, or that it follows the same licensing and restrictions than Pale Moon. But in a matter like this (legal), it's better not to assume anything.\n\nI believe the project needs to be clear, unambiguous about it, both in the source code and in the website (compare Pale Moon). This will also help contributors to know what kind of project this is. (a README would be good as well.)\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Epyrus • Unclear about the License",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-21T14:55:01.000Z"
}