Browser Support • Re: Why is Pale Moon so slow?

Off-topic:

... other than vaguely reopening issues (at least on Basilisk-Dev's part)

Could you please help me understand how me specifying something is not complete and providing a link to a page demonstrating a clear piece of CSS code using that feature that doesn't work is considered vague? I provided enough information for anyone to say "yes this is clearly incomplete" if they click on the link.

Certainly.

You see, it's important to take the full situation into account here. You went the past 2 weeks without any hint of providing the slightest bit of information or cooperation to the upstream repo (branching off without saying a word), and then only post something when Moonchild makes an attempt to merge your changes. The little you did say does not elucidate whether you plan to fully incorporate the issue-relevant changes or anything of a related nature. Quite literally this entire situation has transpired due to vagueness.

As a loose metaphor, let's suppose I disappear from work for two weeks. However, it turns out I didn't disappear; I was working on an improved version of the accounting tool in private! Incredible. It turns out I didn't notify anybody about this, though, leading to them attempting to merge some of my improvements. However, instead of clarifying what exactly isn't done yet, or my plans for it, I simply undo an issue closure and say "This is not complete. Check this link." Okay, so will it be complete in the future? Where exactly does the issue stand? Why is this the first time I'm talking to the company after 2 weeks?

I hope that helps you understand. I won't reply further to this discussion, as I don't want to entirely derail the thread. I think taking a holistic view makes the vagueness pretty clear.