{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicbwhpmbc2jttcxh2aosyym7g3z6wbcnoiyzjjfai2lbngtaabhba",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mm2xrk7ssur2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33437&p=274223#p274223",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-17T16:48:48.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> Would you say then that Pale Moon is likely to be the safest modern browser for the average user to use, since it completely avoids the vast array of vulnerabilities and exploits available against the multi-process browsers?\n\nCan't say if it is the safest, but it's certainly up there. There's a reason I kept up with known Mozilla sec bugs for the entire lifetime. Having less potentially exploitable features/gadgeteering is also working in our favour.\n\n\n> if you were to set up a browser for your dear old aunt, who knows absolutely nothing about browser security issues, and your only concern was that she not trip into some exploit, would you set her up with Pale Moon, Edge, Firefox, Safari, etc?\n\nIt all depends on the dear old aunt and if she is OK with some sites being a PITA. I would likely also suggest Edge as a fallback since that is a pretty hands-off experience and supports UbO to vastly reduce malvertising risk. I don't know enough about Safari on PC to make a determination, it might be a good alternative?. Hate to speak ill of our legacy but current day Firefox is not something I'd recommend anymore. While they may have a decent security setup at least for now, their rather chaotic direction and lack of focus on the browser core makes it more risky. A lot of unforced errors in the sec space I've seen.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Support • Re: Why is Pale Moon so slow?",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-17T16:48:48.000Z"
}