{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreih5cx23dulpfxjxzbc7vhfnejmqgg6gqrguc23opxyktq6ucpxvhe",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlzpj22hyy22"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33451&p=274186#p274186",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-17T05:33:15.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "They should have asked first.\nThey are violating 3a of the redist license, unless the target OS will ONLY allow AppImage (which would fall under the exception carveout).\nI also don't know what an AppImage does otherwise when running it through the tool; if it bundles any GPL3+ licensed binaries within the AppImage package with it, it'll additionally violate the existing source code licensing.\n\nThere's a reason point 3b exists. I researched the whole licensing deal before and Mozilla is actually breaking with the GPL/MPL by distributing Firefox as Snap/AppImage/etc.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Contributed 3rd Party Builds • Re: AppImage of Pale Moon available",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-17T05:33:15.000Z"
}