{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigmlp646vzwz7kntjye6nb4cyam5g2puyf4zds7osp4gzwcursegu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mls5ua5mzdz2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33412&p=273990#p273990",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-14T05:56:48.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> unless your application literally leaves every part of the GUI up to whatever an underlying lib determines the display should be, by only targeting the most abstract of UI definitions.\n\nMaybe that's the whole idea of the concept. Otherwise it just wouldn't make sense in my opinion. Let's not forget that GTK(3) is quite adaptive, it usualy takes into account very well the settings in the CSS as well as any changes that appear at runtime, and styles the widgets accordingly. If GTK4 improves on that and knows how to steer the styling library - be it libadwaita or whatever other compatible - so that it wouldn't mess the widgets' layout then it may just be feasible.\nDarn, can't believe I got to make the apology of GTK4 after all I've read around about it.  I mean... there should be some way to just find out whether we're just dreaming big or it's actually working? If only I had another spare drive for a system clone, I'd try installing GTK4 and some styling library, if possible. It got me intrigued.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: Linux Pale Moon with Qt toolkit",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-14T05:56:48.000Z"
}