{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigjomwlqvtmamoma3esgffcnoinfmiygmjglrp53u5db5cip4qvra",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlosapa2uzb2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33412&p=273923#p273923",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-12T20:38:19.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> X11 has been secure for decades. But ask a Wayland proponent and they will say it's insecure, because they want to marry system core tasks with a graphical environment in Wayland. Not sure who you've been listening to but that very premise makes Wayland actually less secure when looking at the real world where bugs exist.\n\n**Off-topic:**\nWhy am I not surprised that redhat devs created another half baked idea....\n\nWhen I learned of systemd being a huge code base, I knew that it only makes sense if a code base is too huge at some point, no amount of eyes is enough to keep up with the fixes...\n\nThis was my first step to my detesting redhat... but the more time passes, the more I want them to go under.\n\nOr... at the very least, go the way of BSD and do Things... RIGHT.\n\nI mean FFS. It would be so much better if Redhat took the NetBSD or OpenBSD approach.\n\nFreeBSD does have some slime though, can't say if that would make things better or not.\n\nThe more time passes, the more egomaniacs try to ruin anything good in this world. Billionaires, political groups, corporations... etc... you get the idea.\n\n\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: Linux Pale Moon with Qt toolkit",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-12T20:38:19.000Z"
}