{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiacf3jto3jxwhjan2bq2ttpimcr2b6gfherskbsz36betkacs3ejy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlcspgttfu72"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33412&p=273662#p273662",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-08T02:56:27.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> > main reason was the lack of security with X11 since it's apparently insecure\n>\n> X11 has been secure for decades. But ask a Wayland proponent and they will say it's insecure, ...\n\nExactly. As Patrick Volkerding pointed out recently, if the Xorg-server were as insecure as the Wayland proponents claim, you'd think there would be security catastrophes happening regularly, as the hackers went after all that Xorg/X11 low-hanging fruit! Yet this never seems to actually happen...\n\nIn fact, as with any \"mature\" code-base so complex, (some might call it \"spaghetti code,\") there are bound to be \"insecurities\" discovered. Ever since I personally started following the CVEs for Xorg-sever almost a decade ago, all the vulnerabilities have been disclosed by white-hat security research, and freedesktop.org releases updates to patch the flawed code.\n\nIn any event, I myself don't see Wayland \"taking over,\" no matter how hard IBM/Red Hat or anyone else tries to push it...\n\nJust my two cents...\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: Linux Pale Moon with Qt toolkit",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-08T02:56:27.000Z"
}