{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibwefflfbqfcerl33mteiggbhc2jmp36tnolbjbbs44ok4lrcqi2a",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlc6mf7nhpc2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33412&p=273649#p273649",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-07T20:45:48.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> Or should we stick with what we have, make GTK2 and 3 as good as we can, and for future-proofing do away with attempting to integrate with desktop environments and find a way forward that is widget-agnostic?\n\nI'm not sure if what I'm about to say is related, but I think it is. One of Pale Moon's crowning achievements IMO is its ability to match the existing look & feel of the operating system/window manager it is installed on. This is a core UI tenet that so many applications (browsers included) have abandoned, much to my chagrin.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: Linux Pale Moon with Qt toolkit",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-07T20:45:48.000Z"
}