{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiggwts67gw3bvluahdtfwrzixhue7rjtpfi6hj6ejkwzdbzfalv24",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlc6leoorbo2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33412&p=273654#p273654",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-07T21:12:58.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> main reason was the lack of security with X11 since it's apparently insecure\n\nX11 has been secure for decades. But ask a Wayland proponent and they will say it's insecure, because they want to marry system core tasks with a graphical environment in Wayland. Not sure who you've been listening to but that very premise makes Wayland actually _less_ secure when looking at the real world where bugs exist.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: Linux Pale Moon with Qt toolkit",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-07T21:12:58.000Z"
}