{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreia6x7pmp3x3u6hcujmygp3yzmuy445ia6cty6gd3rdaw4ywc5v5um",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlb4zoliyiq2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33412&p=273624#p273624",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-07T10:22:56.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "Oh, wow. That's... less than I thought. I was thinking that it was a lot of trouble for something like 10-20% of the userbase... but it was really closer to 5%.\n\nGranted, I do see a certain amount of value in being attractive to Linux users because they are hacker-types and often know their way around a compiler, which means they might be able to contribute code. But this definitely makes the situation seem absurd. 4% of the users require significantly more work on non-web related issues connected to platform code...\n\nIf that's the case, our position is significantly stronger on this issue than I thought. If a native Linux application doesn't support the latest toolkit, then they have a problem. But if a cross-platform application with 95% Windows and Mac users doesn't support Linux well, then Linux has a problem. I hate to put it that way, but now I understand why you weren't more worried about this issue...\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: Linux Pale Moon with Qt toolkit",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-07T10:22:56.000Z"
}