{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigvn4y52km37fc7k3od3ldst2sumg4gffa5q3owsywwcfwnzjb654",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3ml4wr7qrafy2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33412&p=273502#p273502",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-05T18:03:28.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "tags": [
    "https://www.fltk.org/"
  ],
  "textContent": "> heargument that we'd only consider QT if we found a large number of users to be using KDE is a poor argument for this reason, although there are other reasons that are more valid to stick with what we have for now. GTK4 would be a terrible choice.\n\nWhat about FLTK?\nhttps://www.fltk.org/\n\nIt has so few dependencies and that is why I approve of such an idea.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: Linux Pale Moon with Qt toolkit",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-05T18:03:28.000Z"
}