{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibtptgbesdb334vpnmevchhxlzm5n5ys3nmf2oi76thpyoduhogpm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mky4epglsnc2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33410&p=273347#p273347",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-03T21:23:03.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "tags": [
    "took this road"
  ],
  "textContent": "> For those wondering, looks like Waterfox took this road before Firefox.\n\nIf Waterfox has a native adblocker and it is coming, I'd rather use and trust Watefox's native adblocker than Firefox's native adblocker when \"push comes to shove\" if I am stuck with Manifest 3.\n\nFor me, I \"need\" to know only one thing. And that is if Waterfox's native adblocker will block all of those awful irrelevant ads in YouTube because I sure do not trust Firefox's native adblocker since Mozilla lies in the same bed with Google (money wise).\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Firefox 149 bundles content-blocking engine adblock-rust",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-03T21:23:03.000Z"
}