{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiafa2huxonq733uyw3hehtbj3seyudgjslizkvjkachgqi6fssuze",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkv6ed7pqrz2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33402&p=273210#p273210",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-02T16:38:56.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> Which one do you recommend?\n\nIt's been some time since I last researched this area, but happily using ESET at the moment. It's fully configurable (not unlike Pale Moon itself), you can easily disable the more invasive stuff (e.g. SSL/TLS filtering) and its Web Protection does protect Pale Moon (no need for browser-specific extensions).\n\nI've disabled its own Firewall (they do have a firewall-less version as well) because the WF/WFC combination (see above) is preferred for me. You can find good, working deals on eBay etc. if carefully searched. The official website tends to be pricier.\n\nNote they recently introduced a few features that are only meant for \"supported browsers\" (guess who's not on that list) but it's mostly useless, attention-grabbing PR stuff like \"browser screen protection\". Every single module can be enabled/disabled/configured and I like that a lot.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Support • Re: "Couldn't load XPCOM" - Browser is completely bricked.",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-02T16:38:56.000Z"
}