{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicjorkszcbvlu36243sy32d453i6rou4qe4jdjkp2nxsdypdb7sse",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkv6ealv5xf2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33402&p=273212#p273212",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-02T16:49:43.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> It's been some time since I last researched this area, but happily using ESET at the moment.\n>\n> I've disabled its own Firewall (they do have a firewall-less version as well) because the WF/WFC combination (see above) is preferred for me. You can find good, working deals on eBay etc. if carefully searched. The official website tends to be pricier.\n>\n> Note they recently introduced a few features that are only meant for \"supported browsers\" (guess who's not on that list) but it's mostly useless, attention-grabbing PR stuff like \"browser screen protection\". Every single module can be enabled/disabled/configured and I like that a lot.\n\nThank you very much, plus it supports Pale Moon.\n\nI initially select ESET HOME Security Essential.\n\nNote they recently introduced a few features that are only meant for \"supported browsers\" (guess who's not on that list) - And that doesn't surprise me. But Pale Moon develops faster or slower.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Support • Re: "Couldn't load XPCOM" - Browser is completely bricked.",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-02T16:49:43.000Z"
}