{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidcjpv5pymzq5fr5cjd4qben4iru4v3bp4xfyu2wcuyo3befr6tpa",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkjms5bmaen2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33365&p=272879#p272879",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-28T02:16:28.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "tags": [
    "Osiris"
  ],
  "textContent": "> I would prefer a GTK2 revival to focus mostly on security updates and keeping existing software working as much as possible, I wouldn't want to try and extend it much or use it as the foundation of new projects.\n\nAgreed. Even touchscreen and smooth scrolling support I can't see how could be desirable.\n\n\n**Off-topic:**\n\n\n> FOX and Motif (and QT3/TQT3) are my favorite toolkits still. I also quite like FLTK. I experimented briefly with a FOX frontend for UXP\n\nX Toolkit, Athena, Motif, Tk are mine. Yeah, port Basilisk to Motif or Tk and make it XDG-compliant. That is an order.\n\nBy the way, ever heard of Osiris, a fork of Qt2?\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Other/future projects • Re: GTK2 revival",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-28T02:16:28.000Z"
}