{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifo5425y5fdrxurwzd7tfdb63cwtbi6lfp3knehrezrwnl2zxzg7m",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkh4aawzpfq2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33381&p=272824#p272824",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-27T02:49:55.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "tags": [
    "@athenian200"
  ],
  "textContent": "> I would just put GTK3 first and just say \"GTK3 (Recommended)\" and then \"GTK2\" second. Saying \"it may ultimately need to be deprecated\" will probably make a lot of existing users who specifically want GTK 2 support think we are saying we will eventually drop support completely when that isn't the intention.\n\nMight not be the intention, but from what @athenian200 is saying, it sounds like there may not be much choice. The GNU/Linux distros are already rapidly dropping (or planning to drop) their GTK2 libraries.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Platform Development • Re: Future of GTK2 and Pale Moon",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-27T02:49:55.000Z"
}