{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreig6ommmfnnilxdj2j4vz6tzlh5iscxdzb5f3lhnv26vjgvfu74g2a",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkh4a3clqah2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33381&p=272825#p272825",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-27T02:52:42.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "tags": [
    "@athenian200"
  ],
  "textContent": "> Might not be the intention, but from what @athenian200 is saying, it sounds like there may not be much choice. The GNU/Linux distros are already rapidly dropping (or planning to drop) their GTK2 libraries.\n\nI'm really not interested in maintaining yet another one of the million forks of UXP, which is what I would do if UXP dropped GTK2 support. If the code still works we should keep it regardless and allow the community to support it on a best effort basis. Advanced users can compile their own copy of GTK2 as I stated earlier if they truly need GTK2 support and their distro doesn't provide it.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Platform Development • Re: Future of GTK2 and Pale Moon",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-27T02:52:42.000Z"
}