{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreias7o7lkcj4ddrwegc7um67ztgszs2gu5khqkjb67wwxv47hro6ua",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjnaxozygjg2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33248&p=272413#p272413",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-16T20:20:51.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> Surprised latest uBO works. Tried getting it working on my testing and it just didn't work, maybe I improved it, I don't know.\n> WIll be working on backporting patches from Waterfox Classic as promised too, aswell as working on the CPU usage problem in 13.2.\n\nYes, the latest Firefox uBlock definitely seemed to work, as we saw ads disappear when installed and reappear when removed. As I said, we couldn't interact with uBlock's settings, not even in the Add-on page, but it appeared to be doing its basic job. The Pale Moon version of uBlock appeared to be working well in all respects.\n\n\n> Finally starting work on a Linux port. That and 32 bit Windows will be available in prerelease 1 (nothing much changed except for platform choices)\n\nA port that would work on GNU/Linux distros would be pretty cool. Looking forward to it.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Other Applications • Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-16T20:28:56.000Z"
}