{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreib5wjhskppzc7ukrxet6gw55ybmmzb3f6p7j3wmtd7wyp6ssvg4gq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjl5sd7uxpx2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=32098&p=272355#p272355",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-15T21:45:14.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "tags": [
    "@Moonchild"
  ],
  "textContent": "The problem here is that the decision whether to change (or not) the browser's UI, should be left to user. Not to extension icons.\n\nI like flexibility too but if any extension can happily break it, then there's no point. So, IMO some sort of hardening against extension icons is needed and ideally a few extra options to play with the Status Bar's height.\n\nI believe the Status Bar not getting affected by \"Use Small Icons\" is by design, but cannot be 100%. Only Moonchild can answer this stuff.\n\n\n> I like the fact that the size of the buttons on the \"Status Bar\" isn't limited by a fixed height of this bar, so I don't like the idea of @Moonchild changing this behavior in the Pale Moon code. Instead, he could add an entry in \"about:config\" for the option to make the heights of the \"add-on bar + status bar\" fixed or flexible, depending on users' preferences.\n\nI like it too, but flexible should mean \"only allow the user the change it\", not \"allow any extension icon to break it\".\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Extension Releases/Support • Re: Bypass Cloudflare with Firefox Cookies",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-15T21:45:14.000Z"
}