{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibwie3n7kshodyhu5i3h4eiowixqu6266piw5iuytnouqhd2yhls4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjfh2vysiwi2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=32872&p=272300#p272300",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-13T16:47:59.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> That would indeed be the very worst (if implemented) or best (if ruled un-constitutional) case scenario.\n\nMany people are under the wrong impression that when a case is petitioned to the US Supreme Court, they automatically think the supreme court will hear and rule on the case. This is not true.\n\nPast history has shown in some cases petitioned to the US Supreme Court, sometimes the supreme court \"declines\" to hear and rule on the case. These cases get thrown back to the States so basically, there could be 50 states deciding on how this age verification law will be implemented \"by each individual state\".\n\nWhich means if the individual state has already ruled where the age law has already been ruled consitutional or unconstitutional, those fighting this law will have to come up with a different battle plan lawyer speak wise to get around the first ruling if it can. It is watching a \"game of chess\".\n\nI've got something extra to show you. A YouTube video on this \"age law\" which I think you will like. It is quite interesting coming from a \"common sense\" point of viee, but I will have to find it again since I did not bookmark it.\n\nMight take me awhile since I will have to comb through about 30 videos to find it on this subject which will affect some (or all) linux distros like the two distros I use.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: Linux has over 6% of the desktop market",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-13T16:47:59.000Z"
}