{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidofzlnzujzk7zpde3jnq7bc76anbm3p5rqoc53xq5jeli5wh2dpy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjd55mqb3742"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33306&p=272268#p272268",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-12T18:07:29.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "**Off-topic:**\n\n\n> I have little to no experience with Cinnamon or the potential memory leaks there.\n\nYeah, it's been a fork of Gnome at its inception then it became its own thing. Unfortunately it still suffers from past issues, and some new ones.\nHowever, I chose it primarily due to its ability to be tweaked at will. None of the other desktops I tried or at least seen provides so much versatility, and frankly I couldn't live with something that doesn't look as I please, first of all. My Win98SE - which I used for about 16 years - hasn't looked \"normal\" since I discovered and installed Tihiy's LameSkin which ultimately became Revolutions Pack. Unfortunately I'm out of registry backups on my old 98SE machine and reviving it would take quite some time, otherwise I'd show you a screenshot - it looked just like XP, still on the pink/fuchsia side. The Mint theme you see in my screenshot(s) is also a port of the XP theme I used for a few years inbetween 98SE and Linux Mint. So, as you see, the looks is very important to me considering I spend about all my awake time in front of the screen and couldn't live with something... ugly. Yeah, the desktop you suggest does look a lot like Windows 98 - the \"regular\", official look - but as I said I couldn't live with that either back then. There's no beauty in it, and I can say the looks of an operating system is about the only beauty I can get in my life.\n\nIf I really had to give up Cinnamon I'd definitely go towards Trinity (TDE), which also can be tweaked to a certain extent but not as much as Cinnamon can. I did \"play around\" with a few versions of Q4OS in VirtualBox, I like the way it deals with crashes and other issues, it's more stable than Mint with Cinnamon, being practically a Debian with a fork of KDE 3.5. But for now I don't plan on leaving this system as I managed to build it over the last... almost seven years. I invested too much in it. Yeah, maybe I'm too sentimental.\n\nDefinitely we can discuss over private message or even e-mail when time comes to tweak/improve the build process. I just wish I were more familiar with all the build tools involved, and I feel there are way too many of them. We'll see what we can do.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Browser Development • Re: 34.2.0 build failed, --enable-jxl unknown ??",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-12T18:07:29.000Z"
}