{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidgsnrig4uuii7g26bklq2gj5hbj4szfvkczzn5fkyexkgra4uej4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mj7yeji7udn2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33322&p=272212#p272212",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-11T11:46:48.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> Am I correct in assuming that for any vulnerability, no matter how it was discovered, a potential attacker would still have to find a way to take over your machine, right? Before being able to exploit anything?\n\nNot when it comes to a browser, because by design that is processing and displaying foreign content under control of an attacker. But there's a big difference between a potential vulnerability and a practical exploit that can be reached by crafting a site/document that triggers it when opened. But when it comes to a browser a prerequisite of having a compromised machine is not a thing. In fact it would be a way to compromise a machine, if nothing else.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "General Discussion • Re: This might spawn THOUSANDS of vulnerabilities on Pale Moon (Or might not)",
  "updatedAt": "2026-04-11T11:46:48.000Z"
}