{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihyaidp7us5fqxp23jjpvtddratlcktbkpye73re36bdmh25yylte",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mieovsswowh2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33281&p=271655#p271655",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-31T15:36:24.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> But seriously, if you do want e10s as Mozilla did it to see if you think you can get XUL to work well with it, it might be easier to fork a newer version of Firefox and try to add XUL back in than to work from UXP or one of its forks... a lot of that stuff was explicitly ripped out, and wasn't really complete when we forked off anyway. At least that's my impression?\n\nI fixed some bugs in Serpent (Basilisk)'s handling of e10s such as a input recession (how??????) but I'll try to make it more feature and bug complete with what roytam1's basilisk55 and/or Mypal68's e10s is like.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Platform Development • Re: e10s support question",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-31T15:36:24.000Z"
}