{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreieeb25262iruriq5xtsif3usydqdj4yjoct5jltrjuurrduidna4u",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mi66ltrrffr2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33205&p=271563#p271563",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-29T02:03:24.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> finger-wagging distro maintainers and Guido von Rossum's people put their collective feet down and said, \"No, you can't use Python 2 anymore even if it's just for a big set of glorified Makefiles, you are going to put in two months of hard work to support our Python 3 vision, or it's either forcing people to hunt down ancient OpenSSL versions to build Python 2 from scratch, hoping people know what Tauthon is, or full-blown Docker containers for your project, and we don't care how that affects you.\"\n\n**Off-topic:**\nAnd to that behavior I'd personally reply \"okay, don't expect for any more mainstream adoption of your GNU/Linuxes, BSDs and whatever unix crap you have then, because here in my Windows 11 I can just easily download an old build environment packaged up into a convenient installer. Come back when you have figured out what universal packaging solution you've all adopted instead of fragmenting yourselves and calling that a \"feature\". \"\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Platform Development • Re: I created a Python 3 port of UXP out of boredom...",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-29T02:03:24.000Z"
}