{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifw4ppn2qmrpqpnodq5a2s4mmxxg4dy7nvadtbkicxdoaefgf247a",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mi4plfedaif2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33248&p=271540#p271540",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-28T09:28:26.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> The one thing that jumps out at me that I am not sure I'd want to upstream (at least on Windows) is the override of the system memcpy. I'm pretty sure the memcpy included in MSVC's CRT is probably better than a handwritten version using SSE2...\n>\n> I checked, and MSVC actually implements memcpy as raw ASM that can take advantage of SSE and AVX where available, meaning it's probably faster than any C or C++ implementation could be.\n>\n> Granted, I am not an expert on code review here, but that's my naive intuition as a former CompSci student who didn't graduate due to being bad at Calculus, but otherwise got a lot of the other lessons.\n\nI’ll do a test build with the MSVC memcpy tonight and see if performance increases\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Other Applications • Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-28T09:28:26.000Z"
}