{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihrhomx2um6a5xl3x6n6smapalepgpnskivsv3j7akhqsgqo5erzm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mi325x7obqa2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33248&p=271503#p271503",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-27T21:07:08.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> If there is enough performance improvement with a collection of upstreamed patches that makes for a more balanced set working better on a wider set of processors and not actually benefitting from AVX compiler optimizations, then I'm all for taking away the AVX requirement in mainline and making things simpler for every user regardless of hardware. But... it won't be decided on just a single site's load speed. A lot more testing will have to be done.\n\nI tested on both YouTube and TradingView as those are the two most intensive JS sites I could think of. Let me know of any more “offenders”\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Other Applications • Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-27T21:07:08.000Z"
}