{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreieflmg5fuzd3apcuy3frn27dt77sqtnuy7pmzfnmdlnedtf3n4j4e",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhbth6onipx2"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33248&p=271197#p271197",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-17T12:07:51.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> will you please ensure that your application doesn't compile with the filename \"basilisk.exe\" if you haven't already? I've had people using the Windows XP fork of Basilisk called Serpent come here for support in the past. We'd like to avoid that with your users too.\n\nThe application compiles with the filename \"dactyloidae.exe\" since version 52.10.0 (styled as 10.0), I have removed most branding associated with basilisk to avoid confusion. Still got a couple of areas that still identify itself as Serpent/Basilisk that i'd like to work on.\n\n\n> So you forked a fork of a fork to change the theme? That's an interesting approach. I'd have just made a theme that made it look how I wanted if I wanted the GUI to appear different, but more power to you.\n>\n> Out of curiosity, what are the design elements you did not like?\n\nI didn't like the design of FF52 era Firefox, mainly the styling of the tab bar.\n\nI went with forking Hydra instead of forking from upstream Basilisk because I could not figure out mozillabuild at the time, and by the time I found out the process was relatively the same no matter what fork (except for initializing platform) I was like 20 or so commits in and didn't feel like rebasing lol\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Other Applications • Re: Dactyloidae Browser (Basilisk fork)",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-17T12:07:51.000Z"
}