{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihttpjka5yxlpwlfzhcny3pz4dgndagiwgbp6ibsizz2h2hfmmqte",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:hqad6xwuzg7oqfmwylfkvqfm/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgvai5zvw762"
  },
  "path": "/viewtopic.php?t=33235&p=271051#p271051",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-12T17:59:04.000Z",
  "site": "http://forum.palemoon.org",
  "textContent": "> I doubted this was quite how it was meant, but it is not as if the intended reading is much better.\n\nIntentional vagueness can leave a law like that open to interpretation, and at least in the US we are commonly seeing some pretty wild and crazy judicial interpretations. People literally get thrown in jail over this kind of stuff.\n\n\n> Even if the Digital ID/Age Verification law is passed in another country, that hasn't stopped Australia and UK from trying to impose it on others.\n\nYes, this kind of \"long-arm\" jurisdiction posture is worrisome.\n\n* * *",
  "title": "Forum and website • Re: The site and an idiotic bill",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-12T17:59:04.000Z"
}