{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiccgkzvzp7uptr2adhfz5rxzsi7jpnwlk7nips6v4lthqsxrx45je",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpvc6uuecax2"
  },
  "path": "/t/is-secureblue-really-more-secure-if-browsers-have-to-be-installed-in-flatpaks/38287?page=2#post_27",
  "publishedAt": "2026-07-05T08:37:56.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "tags": [
    "@RKNF404",
    "TailsOS already has it."
  ],
  "textContent": "I’ll just add a few things. @RKNF404, shouldn’t you add your affiliation to Secureblue to your PG account?\n\nAlso, if people want to use Tor with uBlock Origin, TailsOS already has it.\n\nAnd the “Selecting a Browser - Chromium Hardening Guide” thing.. Is borderline lying about LibreWolf. I don’t think it’s fair to list Pale Moon and LibreWolf in the same boat like this.\n\nLW isn’t as depended on Arkenfox as “The Guide” makes it sound. The Firefox hardening community isn’t just Thorin and Arkenfox.\n\nLW also have added its own features like the WebGL permission.\n\nThe slower update cycles aren’t true either. If we should go with this logic then Vanadium, Trivalent, Ironfox, Mullvad Browser, etc. Also have slow update cycles.",
  "title": "Is secureblue really more secure if browsers have to be installed in flatpaks?"
}