{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreih2eqbzz2deuggxkl7lqgthntye6q2o2cey3b6tydadlcsgnmbjeu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mprckibnvlx2"
  },
  "path": "/t/is-secureblue-really-more-secure-if-browsers-have-to-be-installed-in-flatpaks/38287#post_21",
  "publishedAt": "2026-07-03T18:13:31.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "tags": [
    "secureblue",
    "Who is secureblue for? - secureblue: A security-focused desktop and server Linux..."
  ],
  "textContent": "Pioneer:\n\n> TBH the more I read the more confused I am by their attitude, because if you want a secure system but don’t care about open source or privacy then why not use a mac?\n\nSecureblue is for people who want to use Linux as a first priority and want it to be secure as a second priority.\n\nsecureblue\n\n### Who is secureblue for? - secureblue: A security-focused desktop and server Linux...\n\nsecureblue is a security-focused desktop and server Linux operating system, developed as an open-source project. It is shipped as a set of OCI bootable container images, which are generated with BlueBuild, using Fedora Atomic Desktop’s base images as...",
  "title": "Is secureblue really more secure if browsers have to be installed in flatpaks?"
}