{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidhjlw5ndduuw6fxvuxnk3jhfkl6gxawndppuxjde6npyfidipvb4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpj4l7z3vff2"
  },
  "path": "/t/leaving-mullvad-thoughts-about-ivpn/38842?page=5#post_93",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-30T12:48:10.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "textContent": "viktorivpn:\n\n> Or you take an issue with the “we will notify users” part? That text was written 10+ years ago, maybe it needs a revision saying \" attempt to notify\"\n\nThis would be better. I _think_.\n\nviktorivpn:\n\n> but you can absolutely just flip a switch\n\nPrecisely my point. This works both ways. And herein relies on not only trust (which I am not questioning here on your part), but also on matters of legality in what you would be able to say. If you’re ordered not to say anything, then there’s little you can do other than what Lavabit did eventually.\n\nWe also have to bear in mind that some laws also apply extraterritorially. This includes the U.K. IPA. Just look at the state of the U.K. handling and imposition with Apple and ADP!\n\nI fully admire any person or organisation that have these best intentions. This shouldn’t be seen as a criticism and applies across the board, not solely IVPN. I just don’t think explicitly pointing out that you will “notify” users will do you any favours in the longer term when the inevitable happens.",
  "title": "Leaving Mullvad, thoughts about iVPN?"
}