{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiezgncsw5mjxw42xyviaa5z7y7ynt6zq3ty2uzlacaifgfizwhknu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpivu4rf6ij2"
  },
  "path": "/t/leaving-mullvad-thoughts-about-ivpn/38842?page=4#post_87",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-30T10:52:49.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "tags": [
    "including the IPA",
    "iVPN dual jurisdiction?",
    "privacy policy",
    "Swedish legislation relevant to us as a VPN provider",
    "Budapest Convention",
    "Clarification on the Swedish Covert Surveillance Act"
  ],
  "textContent": "Bhaelros:\n\n> good luck getting that order in Gibraltar\n\nGibraltar has often ratified laws the UK passes, including the IPA (?).\n\nBut also: iVPN dual jurisdiction?\n\niVPN dual jurisdiction?\n\n> Regarding your “dual jurisdiction” assessment. Yes we operate in two jurisdictions, that’s a legal fact …\n\nAnd:\n\n> IVPN is subject to EU law … (privacy policy).\n\n* * *\n\nzoqqa:\n\n> Swedish legislation relevant to us as a VPN provider\n\nCuriously, the EU e-Evidence directive and the Budapest Convention are missing? You should write to them if you’re a paying customer.\n\nBut also: Mullvad’s post needs update as the Swedish laws in question have been amended to add more powers since (from what I can tell).\n\nAnd: Clarification on the Swedish Covert Surveillance Act",
  "title": "Leaving Mullvad, thoughts about iVPN?"
}