{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifpqzeyul7dhhdzfavn5s4ijltdxbrdwk2phprwhnooqq4236aaty",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnvpdslbfgr2"
  },
  "path": "/t/canada-s-bill-c-22-why-signal-apple-and-top-vpns-are-fighting-the-surveillance-law/38436#post_1",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-10T02:04:24.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "tags": [
    "TechRadar – 5 Jun 26",
    "Canada's C-22: Signal, Apple, and top VPNs fighting the 'surveillance' law",
    "Michael Geist – 1 Jun 26",
    "The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 270: Roundtable on the Bill C-22 Risks for..."
  ],
  "textContent": "TechRadar – 5 Jun 26\n\n### Canada's C-22: Signal, Apple, and top VPNs fighting the 'surveillance' law\n\nBig tech and privacy companies warn the legislation could undermine privacy\n\nAlso listen to this podcast if you have interest in Canadian politic:\n\nMichael Geist – 1 Jun 26\n\n### The Law Bytes Podcast, Episode 270: Roundtable on the Bill C-22 Risks for...\n\nOver the past week, the concerns over Bill C-22, the government’s lawful access bill, continued to mount. Many companies, notably including Apple, Google, Meta, Signal, and DuckDuckGo, have spoken out against the bill. So too has the VPN sector, with...\n\nEst. reading time: 1 minute",
  "title": "Canada’s Bill C-22: Why Signal, Apple, and top VPNs are fighting the 'surveillance' law"
}