{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibof6aemvzmpaxbco3zy2iqszbyk2g342ajs4lojpjmofxcfu776e",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnsy62ll5nm2"
  },
  "path": "/t/popular-password-managers-fall-short-of-zero-knowledge-claims/35546?page=2#post_34",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-09T00:36:41.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "textContent": "You miss the point. End-to-End encryption is not what was compromised. And yet it did not protect these vaults. The point is the claim made by these companies that they have “Zero Knowledge” when they actually have quite a bit. Enough to compromise existing vaults. Just because these specific exploit techniques were patched against doesn’t mean others don’t exist.\n\nThe problem is the centralized server is there to be attacked, that old weak code creeps in over time and other poorly designed code features leak. Then put 20 million passwords in one place and the motivation to find the next one goes way up.\n\nTake a look at Ink and Switch and the local-first movement.",
  "title": "Popular password managers fall short of “zero-knowledge” claims"
}