{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifzw3g2uax6gbghrtiaekn7pidh7vascrid2h2zvvaitwu6lv5mvy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnfkaij4u5n2"
  },
  "path": "/t/no-right-to-remain-silent-negative-rights-in-a-positive-rights-world/38279#post_5",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-03T15:51:27.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "textContent": "It does look as though CBP may now back down from plans to screen all visitors’ social accounts. There has been a strong backlash from the travel industry in particular.\n\nThat said, it was never just going to be social media. The new requirements published on the Federal Register back in December were sweeping:\n\na. Telephone numbers used in the last five years;\n\nb. Email addresses used in the last ten years;\n\nc. IP addresses and metadata from electronically submitted photos;\n\nd. Family member names (parents, spouse, siblings, children);\n\ne. Family number telephone numbers used in the last five years;\n\nf. Family member dates of birth;\n\ng. Family member places of birth;\n\nh. Family member residencies;\n\ni. Biometrics—face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris;\n\nj. Business telephone numbers used in the last five years;\n\nk. Business email addresses used in the last ten years.",
  "title": "No Right to Remain Silent: Negative Rights in a Positive-Rights World"
}