{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigoze55cuvaijxlrxbmzd5l5vxnrpzwnh6del3qzf4gysg4ighdty",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mncszdre57n2"
  },
  "path": "/t/create-a-warning-for-opensuse-and-nixos-due-to-low-package-availability/38249#post_10",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-02T13:33:43.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "tags": [
    "Repology"
  ],
  "textContent": "Just because one specific app (Mullvad) isn’t packaged for OpenSUSE doesn’t mean there has to be warning.\n\nAs per Repology :\n\n| Total packages | Up to date\n---|---|---\nArch | 12k | 9.6k (86.9%)\nOpenSuse Tumblweed | 16k | 9.9k (75.1%)\nFedora 44 | 23k | 15k (70.0%)\nnixpkgs stable 26.05 | 115k | 71k (85.0%)\nfor comparison: Debian 12 | 34k | 9.6k (33.5%)\n\nBy this logic, Arch should get a warning for having the lowest number of packages* and Fedora a warning for being less up to date than the other recommended distros. Silly, right?\n\n*_which is a bit meaningless anyway because some distros split the same thing into many small packages and others don’t_",
  "title": "Create a warning for OpenSUSE and NixOS due to low package availability"
}