{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreighrmztrzckrnn2nttjcqmswq5tn4mkc6tl3vq66aglhlrgla5fiu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmvltxpgsfp2"
  },
  "path": "/t/im-getting-into-mesh-networks-meshtastic-meshcore-and-reticulum/34963?page=2#post_30",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-28T06:24:47.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "tags": [
    "I'm Getting into Mesh Networks (Meshtastic, MeshCore, and Reticulum) | Hacker News"
  ],
  "textContent": "HN discussion on John’s article: I'm Getting into Mesh Networks (Meshtastic, MeshCore, and Reticulum) | Hacker News\n\n(thus far the discussion has been ordinary)\n\n* * *\n\nwwayers:\n\n> crypto itself (X25519 + AES-256) isn’t getting broken without your keys\n\nI get what you’re trying to say, but:\n\nDepending the mode, ‘AES-256’ can be broken _without_ the key, too. X25519, or any cryptography like EC/DDH that makes computational/polynomial-time hardness assumptions, is similarly vulnerable to quantum computers.",
  "title": "I'm Getting Into Mesh Networks... (Meshtastic, MeshCore, and Reticulum)"
}