{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihsljy4zizyk7c56g5pt744ggs57odajcmaby565uq6wm45qtbpou",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmtipuw57vv2"
  },
  "path": "/t/any-more-innovation-on-using-a-vpn-on-a-router/38132#post_8",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-27T11:45:29.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "textContent": "privacy.slouchy:\n\n> Why do you imply that this single wireguard config is insufficient? What do you think would be gained by a phone-like VPN config app at the router level?\n\nAll the functionality and security that the plain wireguard-go package on openWRT misses compared to what Mullvad offers for starters. Have you even used OpenWRT?\n\nprivacy.slouchy:\n\n> Is there a compelling reason you’d want to manage this at the router level?\n\nAndroid’s always on VPN blocks LAN traffic, aggregating multiple devices into a segmented VPN VLAN saves everyone’s CPU cycles, centralizes the management, saves up devices slots and allows unsupported devices to use the VPN connection.",
  "title": "Any more innovation on using a VPN on a router?"
}