{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibzn7lmyhluqooqztuixbpw7pf45cbhwdih5jgxoccknsed3fudjq",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mm2nicbsuxt2"
  },
  "path": "/t/bitwarden-scrubs-always-free-and-inclusion-values-from-its-website-as-longtime-execs-step-down/37937?page=3#post_47",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-17T14:35:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "textContent": "No integration with desktop app. No native messaging support for example. No categories, no item types. No biometric unlock on browsers. Same for Bitwarden except for biometric login on browser\n\nCloakedNetizen:\n\n> I don’t think you understand what threat models are and why they exist, if this is your thinking. Not sure if you can even compute the concept.\n\nEnlighten me. How is BW better than the Proton and 1Password? BW doesn’t even accept cash or crypto for anon payments. Proton accepts those, but if you use any other methods, even using voucher codes, your identity is known. That is what Proton support told me. 1Password is never about anonymity but still they have better security than the others. Examples, Proton limits security keys with 5 max, Bitwarden doesn’t even accept Windows Hello as passkey for some reason, and 1Password has this secret key on top of regular authentication methods, in addition to no limits of security keys.",
  "title": "Bitwarden scrubs ‘Always free’ and ‘Inclusion’ values from its website as longtime execs step down"
}