{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreif4efl2wpdw363km4wbm5wf2hws5gtwfagck6dxsmlj6rgwpuu4xe",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlntrua53c72"
  },
  "path": "/t/protons-password-manager-passes-audit-by-top-security-firm/37846#post_2",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-12T11:42:22.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "tags": [
    "Recurity Labs(new window)",
    "browser extensions(new window)",
    "mobile and desktop applications(new window)",
    "CLI",
    "An open source privacy company | Proton"
  ],
  "textContent": "The linked press release makes no mention of whether or not server side code was audited only stating that:\n\n> This year, Recurity Labs(new window), an ISO 27001-certified IT security consultancy, tested everything a Proton Pass user interacts with: the Proton Pass browser extensions(new window), mobile and desktop applications(new window), and Command Line Interface(CLI).\n\nThis is still excellent to see. However, personally with something as sensitive as a cloud based password manager I would like to see an audit of that server side code as well, for further transparency.\n\nAlso of note: It does not appear that this most current audit is available at the time of posting at the audit list link provided by Proton in the article. Only a Cure53 audit from June of 2023 shows up for me.\n\n  * An open source privacy company | Proton\n\n",
  "title": "Proton's password manager passes audit by top security firm"
}