{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigq3s3xwiaxl4f2mqsmff3hok46uexvmivnl6ttzkfuzp6s5aqjd4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mksrkjvaeko2"
  },
  "path": "/t/my-grievances-with-proton/37526?page=2#post_38",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-01T18:11:12.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "tags": [
    "above",
    "(click for more details)"
  ],
  "textContent": "banana:\n\n> The cost of maintaining an existing alias is actually, factually, absolutely zero\n\nIn my response, above, I purposely didn’t quote the cost of anything. Reason being, I’m didn’t see any relevance whatsoever. I still don’t.\n\nCan you expand on the relevance of cost? In inclined to agree, partially, that it probably doesn’t have a _significant_ impact and _could_ be offered for free. But then: why would they? That’s not the deal, so I fail to see any relevance at all to the point being made.\n\nOff Topic (click for more details)\n\nbanana:\n\n> In the end, there is only the unnecessary restriction of the user of something that is costless on top of what is already provided.\n\nI think this answers everything. The OP requires a paid feature for free. In which case, everything else is entirely moot.\n\nBest wishes…",
  "title": "My grievances with Proton"
}