{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifwo3rogywoqip3im5amersqwwnnw4qpg6ariku4mckfwvx63v3zm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:haakkg7y3xdghcdmprxeexso/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkax2wu2vej2"
  },
  "path": "/t/would-you-pay-60-for-a-browser-ft-firewalls-dont-stop-dragons/37390#post_17",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-24T15:53:24.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.privacyguides.net",
  "textContent": "PurpleDime:\n\n> I also think that any service that is designed with privacy in mind first should by default, as in at launch, offer the option to pay anonymously for it.\n\nThe issue with this statement and such a sentiment is that people ask for too much for what the product is.\n\nA privacy product should make it such that you can pay privately. A product for your anonymity should have an option to pay for it anonymously.\n\nToo many times this is conflated and the ask is misguided.\n\nPurpleDime:\n\n> I would have to be confident that Brave would not renege on its promise or try to upsell me on new feature later.\n\nThe issue with such a sentiment again is that by logic, nothing is guaranteed in life. Anything that happen at anytime for whatever reason. Technically speaking.\n\nThat notwithstanding, I mean, a basic browser will always remain a basic browser because there is no more innovation left for a browser at the very least to be and do what it needs to and how. There will always be additional features a browser can have which Brave is but Brave Origin is the trimmed down and because the point of it to be and sell Brave as a bloatfree browser, it will always be that. There’s no more upselling needed. So, your thinking here I feel is incorrect.",
  "title": "Would You Pay $60 For A Browser? (ft. Firewalls Don't Stop Dragons)"
}